There have been a lot of talking about “Google/Yahoo/Microsoft: don’t be evil”, and it’s perfect for me that people gets angry when they know that those companies decide to follow countries’ laws to make business.

I put “companies” in bold because what a company searches for, is to make profit. It is easy to understand. Then it should be easy to understand that Google wants to participate in the enormous market that China offers. And who says Google, says Yahoo, Cosco, Mc. Donalds, Starbucks or La Baguetina Catalana.

What I find not so perfect, is that people does not make so much noise when Google, yes, the same mega-evil company, decided NOT to give the US government it’s information about users’ searches..

What happens? If one company decides not to allow some things about the Dalai Lama, Tibet, democracy, etc. is “evil“? What about countries who deals with China? Countries who provides fuel for the trucks which transfer chinese population into the “Tibet Autonomous Region”. Countries who are making deals with China, and who provides it huge amounts of money to pay those ‘political officers’ who seek and arrest dissidents and after torture and kill them. And what about those countries who practice torture and death penalty and/or permit its ‘law oficcers’ the ’shoot to kill’ policy? As for example…China, US, UK and so much other countries…

A company owes to its investors. But a countrie owes to a bigger thing: its citizens. Why nobody got out to the street with signs about “Tony Blair: don’t be evil!”? Saying Tony Blair, means any leader from any country that has commercial agreements with China, which are accomplice of China’s censorship.

There have been a lot of talking about “Google/Yahoo/Microsoft: don’t bê evil”, and it’s perfect for me that people gets angry when they know that those companies decide tom follow countries’ laws tom make business.

E put “companies” in bold because what a colega searches for, is tom make proveito. It is easy tom understand. Then it should cordeiro easy tom understand that Google wants tom participate in the enormous market that China offers. And who says Google, says Yahoo, Cosco, Mc. Donalds, Starbucks ouro A Baguetina Catalã.

What E find not som perfect, is that people does not make som much noise when Google, yes, the same mega-evil colega, decided NOT tom give the VOS government it’s information about users’ searches..

What happens? If one colega decides not tom allow some things about the Dalai Lama, Tibet, democracy, etc. is “evil“? What about countries who deals with China? Countries who provides fuel for the trucks which transfer chinese population into the “Tibet Autonomous Region”. Countries who are making deals with China, and who provides it huge amounts of money tom pay those ‘political officers’ who seek and detenção dissidents and after torturo and kill them. And what about those countries who practice torturo and death penalty and/ouro permit its ‘law oficcers’ the ’shoot tom kill’ policy? As for example…China, VOS, UK and som much other countries…

A colega owes tom its investors. But a countrie owes tom a bigger thing: its citizens. Why nobody got out tom the street with signs about “Tony Blair: don’t bê evil!”? Saying Tony Blair, means ano leader from ano country that tens commercial agreements with China, which are accomplice of China’s censorship.

There have been A lòt of talking about “Google/Yahoo/Microsoft: don’t be evil”, and it’s perfect for me that people gets angry when they know that those companies decide ton follow countries’ laws ton make business.

E put “companies” in bold because what a companh searches for, is ton make profit. It is easy Ton understand. Then it should be easy Ton understand that Google wants ton participate in the enormous market that China offers. And who says Google, says Yahoo, Cosco, Mc. Donalds, Starbucks Aur La Baguetina Catalana.

What E find not son perfect, is that people does not make son much noise when Google, yes, the same mega-evil companh, decided NOT ton give the VOS government it’s information about users’ searches..

What happens? If one Companh decides not ton allow some things about the Dalai Lama, Tibet, democracy, èca. is “evil“? What about countries who deals with China? Countries who provides fuel for the trucks which transfer chinese population into the “Tibet Autonomous Region”. Countries who are making deals with China, and who provides it huge amounts of money Ton pay those ‘political officers’ who seek and arrèst dissident and after # # #el and kill them. And what about those countries who practice Torturi and death penalty and/aur permit its ‘law oficcers’ the ’shoot ton kill’ policy? As for example…China, Vos, UK and son much other countries…

A companh owes ton its investors. But A countrie owes ton a bigger thing: its citizens. Why nobody Veire out ton the street with signs about “Tony Blair: don’t be evil!”? Saying Tony Blair, means an leader from an country that as commercial agreements with China, which are accomplice of China’s censorship.

There have been a lote of talking about “Google/Yahoo/Microsoft: don’t be evil”, and it’s perfect for me that people gets angry when they know that those companies decide tono follow countries’ laws tono make business.

Y put “companies” in bold because what a compañero searches for, is tono make provecho. It is easy tono understand. Then it should cordero easy tono understand that Google wants tono participate in the enormous market that China offers. And who says Google, says Yahoo, Cosco, Mc. Donalds, Starbucks oro La Baguetina Catalana.

What Y find not sonido perfect, is that people does not make sonido much noise when Google, yes, the same mega-evil compañero, decided NOT tono give the OS government it’s information about users’ searches..

What happens? If one compañero decides not tono allow some things about the Dalai Lama, Tibet, democracy, etc. is “evil“? What about countries who deals with China? Countries who provides fuel for the trucks which transfer chinese population into the “Tibet Autonomous Region”. Countries who are making deals with China, and who provides it huge amounts of money tono pay those ‘political officers’ who seek and arresto disidentes and after torturo and kill them. And what about those countries who practice torturo and death penalty and/oro permit its ‘law oficcers’ the ’shoot tono kill’ policy? As for example…China, OS, UK and sonido much other countries…

A compañero owes tono its investors. But a countrie owes tono a bigger thing: its citizens. Why nobody vaso out tono the street with signs about “Tony Blair: don’t be evil!”? Saying Tony Blair, means año leader from año country that has commercial agreements with China, which are accomplice of China’s censorship.